
Typebot
by Typebot · Open-source no-code chat builder for websites and WhatsApp
54.2 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Typebot
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Typebot is a no-code chat builder. Conversations are assembled from building blocks — text, images, videos, buttons, date pickers, payment and file inputs — and deployed as an embedded container, popup, chat bubble, custom domain, WhatsApp bot, or via HTTP requests. It connects to OpenAI, Google Sheets, Zapier and Make.com, and reports completion and drop-off rates with CSV export.
- Best for
- Marketing, support and sales teams building no-code chat forms for websites and WhatsApp
- Pricing
- Free plan with 200 chats/month, then $39/month for Starter (2 seats, 2,000 chats) or $89/month for Pro (5 seats, 10,000 chats); Enterprise by quote.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Open source, with a public GitHub repository
- 45+ blocks: text, buttons, date pickers, payment and file inputs
- Deploy as embed, popup, bubble, custom domain or WhatsApp
- Free plan includes unlimited bots, webhooks and custom JS/CSS
Trade-offs
- Free plan capped at 200 chats/month
- WhatsApp, custom domains and in-depth analytics need the $89/month Pro plan
- Branding removal and file uploads start at $39/month
- SSO, SLAs and ISO 27001 security are Enterprise-quote only
Pricing
Published plans from Typebot’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| PERSONAL | —per workspace |
|
| STARTER | $39per workspace |
|
| PRO | $89per workspace |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 45 out of 100
- Documentation
- 90 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 50 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 80 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 70 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 40 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 55 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Typebot’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


