
Teable
by Teable · AI spreadsheet-database for apps, automations and workflows
48.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Teable
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Teable is a database presented as a spreadsheet, with grid, form, kanban, gallery and calendar views and typed fields including formula, link to record, rollup and lookup. It adds AI fields, AI chat and an app builder, so uploaded files such as receipts, contracts and CVs can be turned into structured records, apps and automation runs. Cloud and self-hosted deployment are both offered.
- Best for
- Small teams replacing scattered spreadsheets with a shared database, AI fields and automations
- Pricing
- Free plan, then $10/seat/month (Pro) and $20/seat/month (Business) billed yearly, or $12 and $24 billed monthly.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free plan includes AI fields, AI chat, app builder and automations
- Self-hosted deployment offered for control over data storage
- Five view types: grid, form, kanban, gallery and calendar
- Unlimited rows per table and custom SMTP email on every plan
Trade-offs
- Free plan capped at 1,000 rows and 100 automation runs a month
- SSO and authority matrix need the $20/seat/month Business plan
- API rate limit stays at 10 requests per second on all three plans
- Audit logs are listed as coming soon
Pricing
Published plans from Teable’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Freeper seat | Free |
|
| Pro | $12per seat | $10 |
|
| Business | $24per seat | $20 |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- Documentation
- 0 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 85 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 60 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 45 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 30 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Teable’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


