
Qt Framework
by Qt · Cross-platform framework for desktop, mobile, embedded and MCU software
40.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Qt Framework
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Qt Framework is a set of libraries and APIs, plus the declarative QML language, for building cross-platform applications and embedded software from one codebase. It covers UI components, 2D and 3D graphics, data visualisation, networking, data handling, accessibility and functional safety, and targets Windows, macOS, Linux, web, Android, iOS, embedded devices and microcontrollers.
- Best for
- Teams building one codebase for desktop, mobile, embedded and microcontroller targets.
- Pricing
- Listed developer licences run $4,300/year (Qt for AD Professional), $4,660/year (Qt for AD Enterprise) and $7,610/year (Qt for DC Professional), with Qt for DC Enterprise and per-device distribution licences quoted on request, alongside an open-source licence option.
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- One codebase deploys to desktop, mobile, embedded and MCUs
- QML gives a clear split between frontend and backend
- Covers UI, 3D, graphs, networking, data handling and accessibility
- Long-term support releases plus an open-source licence option
Trade-offs
- Commercial developer licences cost $4,300–$7,610 per year
- Embedded shipping needs a separate per-device distribution licence
- Distribution licences must be bought 60 days before shipping
- Enterprise and distribution prices are quote-only
Pricing
Published plans from Qt Framework’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Qt for DC Professional | —per year |
|
| Qt for AD Enterprise | —per year |
|
| Qt for AD Professional | —per year |
|
| Qt for DC Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
| Qt Distribution License | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 0 out of 100
- Documentation
- 55 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 70 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 75 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 15 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 40 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Qt Framework’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


