#20 in Code AssistantsUpdated 2026-08

Pullfrog

by Pullfrog · Open-source GitHub agent bot that runs in GitHub Actions

45.6 — BenchRank score out of 100

Homepage

Visit website See full Code Assistants ranking

Overview

Pullfrog is a GitHub bot that runs AI agents inside your own repo's GitHub Actions through a pullfrog.yml workflow. It listens for GitHub events — PRs opened, issues created, reviews submitted, CI failures — and starts agent runs from your configuration, or when someone mentions @pullfrog. Agents get a purpose-built MCP server for git and GitHub operations plus a headless browser.

Best for: GitHub teams wanting PR review, issue triage and CI fixes run by agents in their own Actions
Pricing: Free for personal GitHub accounts, $30/month per organisation for Pro, and a custom-priced Enterprise tier listed as coming soon.

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

Works with any LLM provider; switch models via config change
Flat $30/month per org, no per-run or per-seat billing
Keys kept as GitHub secrets; short-lived install token per run
Built-in headless browser and a GitHub/git MCP server

Trade-offs

GitHub only; needs a pullfrog.yml workflow added to the repo
Free tier covers personal accounts only; orgs pay $30/month
Model spend is separate: BYOK, or Router billed at provider cost
SSO, audit logs and SOC 2 sit in an Enterprise tier marked coming soon

Pricing

Published plans from Pullfrog’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.

Pullfrog pricing tiers, monthly rates in USD
Plan	Monthly	Includes
Developer	—	Unlimited repos, personal GitHub accounts only Bring your own key Configurable automations: PR review, issue triage, CI autofix Custom hooks, MCPs, skills and agents; usage dashboard
Pro	$30per org	Unlimited runs on private repos, repos and members Pullfrog Router or BYOK Cron and custom triggers Usage reports and budgets
Enterprise	Contact sales	Marked COMING SOON on the pricing page GitHub Enterprise support, SSO, audit logs, RBAC SOC 2 / HIPAA, SLAs and dedicated support On-prem or private cloud, committed spend

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

MCP support: 60 out of 100
API quality: 20 out of 100
Documentation: 55 out of 100
Agent friendliness: 38 out of 100
Changelog: 100 out of 100
Marketing site structure: 25 out of 100
Operational trust: 20 out of 100

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

Openness: 60 out of 100
Maintenance: 100 out of 100

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Pullfrog’s score

Alternatives in Code Assistants

Ranked 1
76.8 — BenchRank score out of 100
Warp
Warp · Terminal for running and orchestrating coding agents
Best for: Developers running coding agents like Claude Code or Codex who want them managed in one terminal.
Ranked 2
76 — BenchRank score out of 100
Superset
Superset · Desktop app for running coding agents in parallel Git worktrees
Best for: Developers on macOS running several CLI coding agents in parallel across isolated Git worktrees
Ranked 3
71.9 — BenchRank score out of 100
Frontman
Frontman · AI website editor for existing WordPress, Next.js, Astro and Vite sites
Best for: Designers, PMs and marketing teams editing existing sites without waiting on developer tickets.