
Font Awesome
by Font Awesome · Hosted icon library and toolkit added with a single embed code
46.4 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Font Awesome
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Font Awesome is an icon library and toolkit with over 60,000 icons across 30+ styles. Icons, custom uploads and settings are managed in a Kit and added to a site with a single script tag served from its CDN. It is used with React, Vue, Angular, WordPress and other stacks, and paid annual plans add downloads, npm and Figma access.
- Best for
- Designers and developers who want a hosted icon set added to any site with one embed code.
- Pricing
- Free plan at $0, then Starter $4/month, Solo $8/month and Team $16/month billed annually ($48, $96 and $192 per year), with Enterprise by contacting sales.
- Runs on
- CLI
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- 60k+ icons in 30+ styles; 2,163 icons free and open source
- One script embed adds a Kit to any site, any framework or none
- Free plan with 1 Kit and 10k pageviews, no credit card needed
- Annual Solo/Team add downloads, npm, Figma and a perpetual licence
Trade-offs
- Free plan has no Pro icons, no icon uploads and no team seats
- Starter and all monthly plans are CDN-only; no downloads or self-hosting
- Pageview and bandwidth caps incur overages: $2 per 250K views, $1 per GB
- Extra seats only on Team, at $20 per seat on graduated pricing
Pricing
Published plans from Font Awesome’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | —per plan | — |
|
| Starter | —per plan | $4 |
|
| Solo | —per plan | $8 |
|
| Team | —per plan | $16 |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 25 out of 100
- Documentation
- 80 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 35 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 75 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 70 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 15 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 30 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 90 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Font Awesome’s score
Alternatives in Frameworks & Libraries
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Encore
Encore · Declare backend infrastructure in Go or TypeScript, deploy to your own cloud
Best for: Teams building Go or TypeScript backends on their own AWS or GCP without a platform team
Ranked 2
78.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Builder.io
Builder · Collaborative platform for building software with AI agents
Best for: Product teams wanting designers, PMs and marketers to edit the real codebase alongside engineers
Ranked 3
78.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Convex
Convex · Reactive TypeScript backend with database, functions, sync and search
Best for: Teams building TypeScript apps that want database, functions, sync and file storage in one backend


