
Bruno
by Bruno · Git-native, local-first API client for REST, GraphQL, gRPC and WebSocket
49.9 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Bruno
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Bruno is an open-source API client for REST, GraphQL, gRPC and WebSocket requests. Collections are stored as plain-text files on your filesystem using the OpenCollection YAML format, so they can be branched, diffed, reviewed and merged in Git alongside the code they belong to. There is no cloud sync, account or login, and it runs in the desktop app, VS Code and the terminal.
- Best for
- Development teams who want API collections version-controlled in Git rather than synced to a vendor cloud.
- Pricing
- Open-source tier is free; Pro is $6 per user/month and Ultimate $11 per user/month, both billed annually, with a 14-day Ultimate trial and a contact-sales option.
- Runs on
- macOSWindowsSelf-hostedCLI
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Collections are plain-text files you version with Git
- No cloud sync or account; requests stay on your machine
- Free open-source tier covers HTTP, REST, GraphQL and gRPC
- SSO, SCIM and secret manager integrations on paid plans
Trade-offs
- Free tier caps workspaces at 2 and OpenAPI syncs at 5 a month
- Private Git provider support requires a paid plan
- SSO, SCIM and audit logs are on the Ultimate plan only
- Open-source tier has community support only, with no SLA
Pricing
Published plans from Bruno’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source | Freeper user | Free |
|
| Pro | —per user | $6 |
|
| Ultimate | —per user | $11 |
|
| Contact Sales | Contact sales | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- API quality
- 10 out of 100
- Documentation
- 80 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 78 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 55 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 35 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 60 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Bruno’s score
Alternatives in API Development
Ranked 1
86 — BenchRank score out of 100Postman
Postman · API platform for designing, testing, monitoring and distributing APIs
Best for: Development teams building, testing and managing APIs who want one tool from spec to monitoring.
Ranked 2
84.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Scalar
Scalar · API docs, SDKs, MCP servers and an API client from one OpenAPI file
Best for: API teams that want docs, SDKs and MCP servers generated from one OpenAPI document
Ranked 3
72.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Fern
Fern · Docs, SDKs and a CLI generated from your API spec
Best for: Teams with an OpenAPI-style spec who want hosted docs, generated SDKs and a CLI from one source


