#31 in Application SecurityUpdated 2026-08

XEOL

by Xeol · Find and fix end-of-life open source across your stack

32.9 — BenchRank score out of 100

Homepage

Visit website See full Application Security ranking

Overview

XEOL, a HeroDevs division, helps companies find and fix end-of-life issues across their open source stack. It publishes an EOL Dataset intended to surface abandoned packages that a standard scanner does not flag, alongside an Explorer and documentation. HeroDevs positions the combination as identifying and remediating unsupported software in one workflow.

Best for: Teams needing to find and fix end-of-life open source components across their stack
Pricing: No prices are shown on the captured page; it offers 'Get Started Free' for the EOL Dataset and 'Get Early Access' for the product.
Runs on: Web

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

Covers end-of-life issues across the whole open source stack
EOL Dataset surfaces abandoned packages scanners miss
Backed by HeroDevs, which has acquired the product
Free entry point advertised via 'Get Started Free'

Trade-offs

Main product is gated behind 'Get Early Access'
No pricing published on the captured page
Captured page gives no detail on scanning or integrations
Now part of HeroDevs, so the standalone roadmap is unclear

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

MCP support: 0 out of 100
API quality: 45 out of 100
Documentation: 35 out of 100
Agent friendliness: 55 out of 100
Changelog: 0 out of 100
Marketing site structure: 70 out of 100
Operational trust: 40 out of 100

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

Openness: 60 out of 100
Maintenance: 85 out of 100

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with XEOL’s score

Alternatives in Application Security

Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100
Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
81.2 — BenchRank score out of 100
GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
77.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server