#7 in Orchestration & SchedulingUpdated 2026-08

Terrateam

by Terrateam · GitOps orchestration for infrastructure as code in pull requests

64.8 — BenchRank score out of 100

Homepage
Pricing page

Visit website See full Orchestration & Scheduling ranking

Overview

Terrateam runs infrastructure-as-code workflows inside pull requests: it plans changes, estimates cost, applies OPA, Conftest or Checkov policies, and enforces approval rules before an apply is triggered by a PR comment. It supports Terraform, OpenTofu, Terragrunt, Pulumi, CDKTF and custom CLIs, is configured by a YAML file in the repository, and runs in its cloud or self-hosted.

Best for: Platform teams running Terraform or OpenTofu changes through GitHub or GitLab pull requests
Pricing: Free tier at $0/month for 50 runs, 3 users and 1 private runner; one paid plan, Pro, at $12,000/year ($1,000/month billed annually) with a 30-day trial.
Runs on: WebSelf-hosted

Strengths and trade-offs

Strengths

Free tier carries every feature, limited by usage not by function
Works with Terraform, OpenTofu, Terragrunt, Pulumi and custom CLIs
Flat $12,000/year price published, no per-seat or per-run metering
Cost estimation and policy checks run inside the pull request

Trade-offs

Free tier stops at 50 runs a month, 3 users and 1 private runner
One jump from free to $12,000/year, with no plan in between
Self-hosting, priority support and 365-day audit are paid-plan only
Pro is billed annually; no month-to-month billing option is shown

Pricing

Published plans from Terrateam’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.

Terrateam pricing tiers, monthly and annual rates in USD
Plan	Monthly	Annual (per month)	Includes
Free	Freeflat rate	—	50 runs/month, 3 users, 1 private runner All features: cost estimation, policy, drift detection, API SSO, RBAC, CODEOWNERS and Gatekeeper included Community support, 30-day audit retention
Pro	—flat rate, billed annually	$1000	$12,000/yr; unlimited runs, users and concurrency Unlimited private runners Cloud or self-hosted deployment Priority support by email and Slack, 365-day audit retention

How this score is made up

Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.

MCP support: 0 out of 100
API quality: 50 out of 100
Documentation: 90 out of 100
Agent friendliness: 82 out of 100
Pricing transparency: 100 out of 100
Changelog: 100 out of 100
Marketing site structure: 80 out of 100
Operational trust: 60 out of 100

Measured, but not part of the score

Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.

Openness: 85 out of 100
Maintenance: 100 out of 100

This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Terrateam’s score

Alternatives in Orchestration & Scheduling

Ranked 1
80.8 — BenchRank score out of 100
Prefect
Prefect · Python-decorator workflow orchestration for data, ML and agents
Best for: Python data and ML teams that want scheduled, self-retrying pipelines without hosting a scheduler
Ranked 2
79.4 — BenchRank score out of 100
Temporal
Temporal · Durable execution for workflows, AI agents and long-running jobs
Best for: Engineering teams running long workflows, pipelines or AI agents that must survive crashes and retries
Ranked 3
78 — BenchRank score out of 100
Inngest
Inngest · Durable execution for background jobs, workflows and AI agents
Best for: Teams adding retries, flow control and step-level tracing to background jobs and AI agents.