
SWIRL
by Swirl Search · Federated enterprise search and MCP layer that leaves data in place
66.1 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of SWIRL
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
SWIRL is a knowledge layer that runs in your own tenant and queries connected systems live instead of copying them into an index. It federates one search across 150+ sources, ranks and de-duplicates the results, and can produce cited RAG answers using any LLM, including on-prem models. Agents reach the same results through its MCP server or REST API.
- Best for
- Regulated enterprises wanting AI search over existing systems without copying data to a new index
- Pricing
- Annual platform licence: Departmental $24,000/year, Business $72,000/year and Enterprise from $150,000/year, plus a $12,000 60-90 day pilot credited to a first contract; the Semantic Cache add-on and OEM licensing (from $60,000/year plus revenue share) are priced separately.
- Runs on
- macOSSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Searches source systems in place - no second index or vector database
- 150+ connectors, including M365, Salesforce, iManage and Snowflake
- First-class MCP server and REST API for agent access
- Runs in your own tenant, with on-prem and air-gapped options
Trade-offs
- Canonical answers and pinning sit in the Semantic Cache add-on, sold apart
- Annual licence only, from $24K/year; no free or self-serve tier
- You supply the LLM and the infrastructure it runs on
- Full connector library and analytics start at the $72K Business edition
Pricing
Published plans from SWIRL’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Departmental | —annual platform licence |
|
| Business | —annual platform licence |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 30 out of 100
- Documentation
- 90 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 100 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 0 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 90 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with SWIRL’s score
Alternatives in AI Search & Research
Ranked 1
67.7 — BenchRank score out of 100Onyx
Onyx · Open-source AI chat and search over company docs and apps
Best for: Teams wanting an open-source AI chat and search layer over their own docs, apps and people.
Ranked 3
62.1 — BenchRank score out of 100PipesHub
Pipeshub · Open-source, self-hosted search and AI agents over your business apps
Best for: Teams wanting self-hosted, permission-aware search and AI agents across their connected business apps
Ranked 4
61.9 — BenchRank score out of 100Feedly Threat Intelligence
Feedly · AI threat intelligence collection and reporting for CTI teams
Best for: CTI teams collecting open-source threat intel and producing briefings for security stakeholders


