
Icinga
by Icinga · Self-hosted open-source monitoring for hybrid infrastructure
51.5 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Icinga
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Icinga is open-source infrastructure monitoring you run yourself, covering servers, networks, Windows and Kubernetes. It runs custom checks and plugins, sends notifications, and collects metrics and logs. Configuration is driven through its API and Git-based workflows with tools such as Ansible, Puppet or Terraform.
- Best for
- Ops teams that want to self-host monitoring across on-prem, cloud and Kubernetes infrastructure.
- Pricing
- Free and open source forever, with paid annual subscriptions: repository access at €5,000/year, enterprise modules at €2,000/year, and support from €15,000/year.
- Runs on
- AndroidSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free edition monitors unlimited hosts and services
- Automates via API, Git, Ansible, Puppet or Terraform
- Integrates with Grafana, Prometheus, InfluxDB, Elasticsearch
- Open source and self-hosted, so you keep the data
Trade-offs
- Support subscriptions start at €15,000/year, scaled by infrastructure size
- Enterprise Linux install packages need a €5,000/year subscription
- Teams, ServiceNow and SAML modules are listed as upcoming, not shipped
- Every paid tier routes through sales, with no self-serve checkout
Pricing
Published plans from Icinga’s own pricing page, in EUR. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Forever Free Edition | — |
|
| Repository Subscription | —per year |
|
| Module Subscription | —per year |
|
| Support Subscription | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 70 out of 100
- Documentation
- 70 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 85 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 20 out of 100
- Changelog
- 0 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 25 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 40 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Icinga’s score
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
88.3 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 2
88 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 3
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace


