Gigapipe
by Gigapipe · ClickHouse-based observability backend for logs, metrics, traces and profiles
43 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Gigapipe
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Gigapipe stores logs, metrics, traces and profiles in one ClickHouse-backed engine and is queried through the Grafana UI. It accepts ingestion and query protocols used by Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, Pyroscope, OpenTelemetry, InfluxDB, Elastic and Datadog. It can be self-hosted under AGPLv3, deployed in your own cloud, or run as a managed plan, with ClickHouse or S3-compatible storage.
- Best for
- Engineering teams on Grafana who want a self-hostable observability backend with flat pricing
- Pricing
- Free AGPLv3 open-source edition; Pro at €349/month after a 14-day trial, with extra storage at €100 per TB; Enterprise is quoted on request.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- One ClickHouse engine for logs, metrics, traces and profiles
- Flat pricing: no per-seat fees, no metered ingestion
- Keeps existing agents via Loki, Prometheus and OTel protocols
- Run on-premise, in your own cloud, or fully managed
Trade-offs
- Pro is standalone only; HA and multi-node need Enterprise
- Storage above the 600 GB base costs €100 per extra TB
- Visualisation still relies on Grafana; no UI of its own
- Homepage and pricing page state different Pro ingest limits
Pricing
Published plans from Gigapipe’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | —open source |
|
| Pro | €349flat rate, not per seat |
|
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- Documentation
- 35 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 45 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 55 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 0 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 40 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Gigapipe’s score
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
88.3 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 2
88 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 3
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace


