
Fing
by Fing · Network scanner and device monitoring for home and business networks
37.4 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Fing
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Fing scans local networks to identify every connected device, drawing on a catalogue of 450,000 device models. It runs as a desktop app, a mobile app, a browser view and an agent on Raspberry Pi, NAS or Docker, all syncing through one account. Paid plans add continuous monitoring, a full event timeline, alerts, router vulnerability checks and device blocking.
- Best for
- Home users and small IT teams who need to inventory, monitor and control devices on a network.
- Pricing
- Free plan at $0, then Premium at $69.99/year and Professional at $149.99/year, with checkout prices varying by region.
- Runs on
- WebiOSAndroidmacOSWindowsLinux
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Recognises devices against a catalogue of 450,000 device models
- Desktop, mobile, web and Raspberry Pi/Docker agent share one account
- Paid plans auto-block unknown devices and schedule Internet downtime
- SOC 2 Type II certified
Trade-offs
- Continuous monitoring needs Fing Desktop or an always-on Fing Agent
- Free plan caps manual scans at 3 per day, with no automated scans
- Premium covers 2 monitored networks, Professional 3
- Workspaces and multi-user collaboration are Professional-only
Pricing
Published plans from Fing’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | —per account |
|
| Premium | —per account |
|
| Professional | —per account |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 0 out of 100
- Documentation
- 45 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 55 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 75 out of 100
- Changelog
- 0 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 75 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 20 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 25 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Fing’s score
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
88.3 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 2
88 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 3
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace


