FeatBit
by FeatBit · Open-source feature flag management for self-hosted releases
71.3 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of FeatBit
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
FeatBit is an open-source feature flag platform for progressive rollout, A/B testing, safe release and rollback. It is self-hosted on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure or Docker Compose, and provides server and client SDKs, a REST API, webhooks, a CLI and real-time flag updates over WebSocket. An MCP server and agent skills connect it to AI coding agents.
- Best for
- Engineering teams that want to self-host feature flags and keep release data in-house.
- Pricing
- Self-host Foundation is free and open source; Enterprise is $3,999/year (Advanced RBAC +$600/year); Enterprise Premium is custom-priced on request.
- Runs on
- WebSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free self-host tier with no seat, MAU or project limits
- Deploys on Docker Compose, Kubernetes, AWS or Azure
- Server and client SDKs, REST API, webhooks and a CLI
- Real-time flag updates over WebSocket
Trade-offs
- Advanced RBAC costs an extra $600/year on top of Enterprise
- Experimentation is in beta and CUPED is listed as coming soon
- Self-hosting means you run and maintain the infrastructure yourself
- Dedicated support and SLAs only come with the paid plans
Pricing
Published plans from FeatBit’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation | — |
|
| Enterprise | —flat rate, $3,999 per year |
|
| Enterprise Premium | Contact sales |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 92 out of 100
- API quality
- 10 out of 100
- Documentation
- 90 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 73 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 100 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 30 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with FeatBit’s score
Alternatives in Application Security
Ranked 1
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace
Ranked 2
81.2 — BenchRank score out of 100GrowthBook
GrowthBook · Warehouse-native feature flags, experimentation and product analytics
Best for: Product and engineering teams running feature flags and experiments on their own data warehouse.
Ranked 3
77.5 — BenchRank score out of 100Temps
Temps · Self-hosted deploy platform with built-in analytics, errors and monitoring
Best for: Teams self-hosting deployments who also want analytics, error tracking and uptime on their own server


