
Coroot
by Coroot · eBPF-based self-hosted observability for metrics, logs, traces and profiles
57.1 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Coroot
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Coroot is a self-hosted observability platform that uses eBPF to gather metrics, logs, traces and profiles without code changes. It covers applications, databases, infrastructure, cloud and network in one view, and handles storage, visualisation, alerting and SLO tracking. AI-assisted root cause analysis traces dependencies and suggests fixes.
- Best for
- SRE and DevOps teams wanting self-hosted, per-core-priced observability without instrumenting code
- Pricing
- A free open-source Community Edition on GitHub, then Standard at $1 per monitored CPU core/month with volume discounts, and Premium on contact-sales pricing; a 14-day trial is offered with no credit card.
- Runs on
- Self-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- eBPF-based collection, so no code changes or instrumentation
- Priced per monitored CPU core rather than by data volume
- Self-hosted, so telemetry stays in your own infrastructure
- Metrics, logs, traces and profiles in a single platform
Trade-offs
- Self-hosted only; the pages show no managed or hosted option
- Standard support is business hours only; 24×7 and phone need Premium
- Premium pricing is not published — you must contact sales
- Cost tracks CPU core count, so idle cores still cost the same
Pricing
Published plans from Coroot’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | $1per monitored CPU core |
|
| Premium | Contact sales |
|
| Open Source Community Edition | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 20 out of 100
- Documentation
- 60 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 60 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 85 out of 100
- Changelog
- 100 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 75 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 0 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 85 out of 100
- Maintenance
- 100 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Coroot’s score
Alternatives in Monitoring & Observability
Ranked 1
88.3 — BenchRank score out of 100OneUptime
OneUptime · Open-source observability and incident management on one platform
Best for: Teams wanting monitoring, on-call, status pages and observability on one open-source platform
Ranked 2
88 — BenchRank score out of 100openstatus
OpenStatus · Open source status pages with uptime monitoring from 28 regions
Best for: Teams that need a public status page and uptime checks while working towards SOC 2.
Ranked 3
81.6 — BenchRank score out of 100Sentry
Sentry · Error tracking and application performance monitoring for developers
Best for: Development teams wanting error monitoring, tracing and session replay tied to one trace


