
Claude
by Claude · AI assistant for coding, analysis and knowledge work
63.7 — BenchRank score out of 100
Screenshots of Claude
Homepage Pricing page
Overview
Claude is Anthropic's AI assistant for writing, coding, data analysis and research. It runs on the web, iOS, Android and a desktop app, and can reach external data and tools through connectors and remote MCP. Claude Cowork adds delegated tasks that can be scheduled daily, weekly or monthly and returned as a document, deck or spreadsheet.
- Best for
- Individuals and small teams wanting one AI assistant for coding, analysis and document work
- Pricing
- Free tier, then Pro at $20/month or $17/month billed annually ($200 up front), and Max from $100/month; Team and Enterprise prices are not shown.
- Runs on
- WebiOSAndroidSelf-hosted
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Free tier includes web search, memory and MCP connectors
- Pro bundles Claude Code, Cowork, Design and Science
- Four models, from Haiku for quick answers to Fable for long projects
- Runs on web, iOS, Android and a macOS/Windows desktop app
Trade-offs
- Usage limits apply on every plan, including Max
- Team and Enterprise prices are not published on the pricing page
- Model training is listed as opt-out, not opt-in, on all plans
- Context window is 200k on every plan, including Max 20x
Pricing
Published plans from Claude’s own pricing page, in USD. Usage charges and add-ons may apply on top.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per month) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | —per user | — |
|
| Pro | $20per user | $17 |
|
| Max | $100per user | — |
|
How this score is made up
Each dimension is scored out of 100 and combined into the headline score using fixed weights.
- MCP support
- 60 out of 100
- API quality
- 55 out of 100
- Documentation
- 80 out of 100
- Agent friendliness
- 68 out of 100
- Pricing transparency
- 100 out of 100
- Customer sentiment
- 79 out of 100
- Changelog
- 0 out of 100
- Marketing site structure
- 50 out of 100
- Operational trust
- 65 out of 100
Measured, but not part of the score
Useful to know, but not a mark for or against the product — so these do not affect the ranking.
- Openness
- 25 out of 100
This doesn’t look right — report a problem with Claude’s score
Alternatives in Chat Assistants
Ranked 1
77.1 — BenchRank score out of 100Browser Use
Browser Use · Open-source browser automation with hosted stealth browsers and agents
Best for: Teams building web automation that need hosted stealth browsers and agent APIs, plus an open-source library
Ranked 2
76.6 — BenchRank score out of 100LobeHub
LobeHub · Hosted multi-agent platform with a skills and MCP marketplace
Best for: Individuals and small teams wanting to run several AI agents on a hosted, credit-metered platform
Ranked 3
68.8 — BenchRank score out of 100Open WebUI
Open WebUI · Self-hosted interface for running local and cloud AI models
Best for: Teams that want to self-host one interface over local and cloud models on their own infrastructure.


